<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Washington Post can set new standard for online journalism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://flipthemedia.com/index.php/2008/09/washington-post-can-set-new-standard-for-online-journalism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://flipthemedia.com/index.php/2008/09/washington-post-can-set-new-standard-for-online-journalism/</link>
	<description>A blog about the digital media revolution</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 19:53:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Washington Post can set new standard for online journalism &#171; Midwest by Northwest</title>
		<link>http://flipthemedia.com/index.php/2008/09/washington-post-can-set-new-standard-for-online-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-1081</link>
		<dc:creator>Washington Post can set new standard for online journalism &#171; Midwest by Northwest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 07:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flipthemedia.com/?p=1246#comment-1081</guid>
		<description>[...] posted by me at FlipTheMedia.com on Tuesday, September 30th, 2008 at 1:22 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] posted by me at FlipTheMedia.com on Tuesday, September 30th, 2008 at 1:22 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alvin Singh</title>
		<link>http://flipthemedia.com/index.php/2008/09/washington-post-can-set-new-standard-for-online-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-1076</link>
		<dc:creator>Alvin Singh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 01:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flipthemedia.com/?p=1246#comment-1076</guid>
		<description>Great article and proves that traditonal newspapers will not only have to have a good web presence but a also news linked website that will provide more than just one wrting staff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article and proves that traditonal newspapers will not only have to have a good web presence but a also news linked website that will provide more than just one wrting staff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: randa</title>
		<link>http://flipthemedia.com/index.php/2008/09/washington-post-can-set-new-standard-for-online-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-1072</link>
		<dc:creator>randa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 20:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flipthemedia.com/?p=1246#comment-1072</guid>
		<description>Since joining the MCDM program, I read more news online and from a variety of sources.  However, the sources I read from are online versions of established newspapers, not USG blogs for NEWS.  I read (over the course of a week) viewpoints from seven countries now. Britain: The Telegraph/Financial Times/The Herald; Brussels Journal; Hong Kong; PRC; Buenos Aires Herald; and Canada&#039;s The Globe. Then of course there are the USA papers: The Seattle Times/PI and NY Times, sometimes the WA Post.  Though I have browsed the non-traditional sites, I don&#039;t find them compelling, they fail to &#039;stick&#039; me with return-itis.  I find them sensationalized like &#039;The Star&#039;...intended to raise one&#039;s blood pressure.  I do however, read subject matter &#039;expert&#039; blogs such as The Sartorialist and Technorati.
 
I am happy to hear the published newspapers are linking to their contributor sites.  Perhaps that will help improve the quality of writing one finds on the web, raise these articles higher in the ratings so we can find them via search engines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since joining the MCDM program, I read more news online and from a variety of sources.  However, the sources I read from are online versions of established newspapers, not USG blogs for NEWS.  I read (over the course of a week) viewpoints from seven countries now. Britain: The Telegraph/Financial Times/The Herald; Brussels Journal; Hong Kong; PRC; Buenos Aires Herald; and Canada&#8217;s The Globe. Then of course there are the USA papers: The Seattle Times/PI and NY Times, sometimes the WA Post.  Though I have browsed the non-traditional sites, I don&#8217;t find them compelling, they fail to &#8216;stick&#8217; me with return-itis.  I find them sensationalized like &#8216;The Star&#8217;&#8230;intended to raise one&#8217;s blood pressure.  I do however, read subject matter &#8216;expert&#8217; blogs such as The Sartorialist and Technorati.</p>
<p>I am happy to hear the published newspapers are linking to their contributor sites.  Perhaps that will help improve the quality of writing one finds on the web, raise these articles higher in the ratings so we can find them via search engines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: harlan clonts</title>
		<link>http://flipthemedia.com/index.php/2008/09/washington-post-can-set-new-standard-for-online-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-1062</link>
		<dc:creator>harlan clonts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 04:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flipthemedia.com/?p=1246#comment-1062</guid>
		<description>Weird..we were discussing new media in class today. Your program seems to be not on top of the ball, but rather, creating it. Best of luck, to the whole program. 
Sincerely, 
One person in Wichita.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Weird..we were discussing new media in class today. Your program seems to be not on top of the ball, but rather, creating it. Best of luck, to the whole program.<br />
Sincerely,<br />
One person in Wichita.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
