In my first MCDM class at the University of Washington, my professor Hanson Hosein mentioned a website called Hulu that offers free streaming videos of TV sitcoms from NBC, FOX and other stations. This is a interesting “business model” that Hulu uses to distribute the episodes in a high resolution format that can be syndicated to other sites like Comedy Central, PBS, USA Networks, and motion pictures. Now MTV is joining the market with a vast archive of music videos from most of the top record labels into a new website called MTVmusic. The videos like Hulu will be ad-supported and free with interactive options like embedding onto blogs.
Since music videos have been a popular audience on YouTube there is a increasing opportunity for a long standing music network like MTV to host its own version of a digital media website. I think this is a example of how quickly traditional media outlets are discovering ways to enter the social media field. In recent news many popular magazines have started reevaluating their success and adapt to new forms of reporting. Here is a article about how Christian Monitor becomes the first national newspaper to stop their daily publication and go online only.
But I cant deny that watching old Duran Duran “Hungry like a wolf”, and Michael Jackson “Thriller”bring back funny memories. Check it out and see your favorite 80′s video.
Question: What is your next prediction of a traditional media firm facing the decision to join the Groundswell?
Leave a comment let me know!


















(2 votes, average: 3.50 out of 5)
Get email updates
3 Comments, Comment or Ping
mwalls2
Maybe the next prediction would be user and fan generated television content created just for the web? Like the Star Trek: New Voyages series?
Oct 30th, 2008
Nabil
I have a sneaking suspicion that mtvmusic.com grew out of two related elements: Viacom (MTV’s parent company) sued YouTube for copyright infringement two years ago for posting a number of music videos they claimed broadcast rights on. So, by providing the service themselves, they 1) strengthen their case against YouTube by closing potential defenses (Accessibility for instance), and 2) allow them to take over a (now proven) source of revenue. I’m not making a moral judgement on the reasoning, but it seems a fair reasoning for why they’d do this now.
My prediction is that we’re going to start seeing traditional media companies (such as Viacom, NBC Universal, Newscorp, others) further embrace online distribution models by funding shows specifically for a web-based audience. There have been a few toes in the pool so far, but I expect to see an array of full series done for a web audience, funded by a large media company, within the next year.
Oct 30th, 2008
Pei-chieh
Maybe TV shows are produced by fans on the Internet and traditional media companies buy from them?
Nov 3rd, 2008
Reply to “MTV learns from HULU”