<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: gdgt connects geeks with gadgets</title>
	<atom:link href="http://flipthemedia.com/index.php/2009/07/gdgt-connects-geeks-with-gadgets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://flipthemedia.com/index.php/2009/07/gdgt-connects-geeks-with-gadgets/</link>
	<description>A blog about the digital media revolution</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 19:53:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mepriestley</title>
		<link>http://flipthemedia.com/index.php/2009/07/gdgt-connects-geeks-with-gadgets/comment-page-1/#comment-3587</link>
		<dc:creator>mepriestley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 13:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flipthemedia.com/?p=3342#comment-3587</guid>
		<description>I think gdgt is a great idea. I&#039;ve been following @gdgt on Twitter since the announcement of gdgt site last September. I agree though, that it won&#039;t really &quot;compete&quot; with Engadget and Gizmodo only because they are two different kind of sites. Peter said it complements it and I can see that. Personally, I read Engadget and Giz everyday and subscribe to the posts. On gdgt it seems you can subscribe to activity of users, but I wouldn&#039;t really be interested in that. I think it&#039;s a site that I will check once a day, refer friends looking to buy gadgets, and comment on gadgets when I feel the urge to do so. I think it&#039;s a great site and see it more of a place to go instead of say CNET or Consumer Reports when looking for reviews and to compare electronics and accessories. The site has enormous potential and as a consumer and gadget geek myself, I can&#039;t wait to see where gdgt will take things in the future. Great post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think gdgt is a great idea. I&#8217;ve been following @gdgt on Twitter since the announcement of gdgt site last September. I agree though, that it won&#8217;t really &#8220;compete&#8221; with Engadget and Gizmodo only because they are two different kind of sites. Peter said it complements it and I can see that. Personally, I read Engadget and Giz everyday and subscribe to the posts. On gdgt it seems you can subscribe to activity of users, but I wouldn&#8217;t really be interested in that. I think it&#8217;s a site that I will check once a day, refer friends looking to buy gadgets, and comment on gadgets when I feel the urge to do so. I think it&#8217;s a great site and see it more of a place to go instead of say CNET or Consumer Reports when looking for reviews and to compare electronics and accessories. The site has enormous potential and as a consumer and gadget geek myself, I can&#8217;t wait to see where gdgt will take things in the future. Great post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Rojas</title>
		<link>http://flipthemedia.com/index.php/2009/07/gdgt-connects-geeks-with-gadgets/comment-page-1/#comment-3583</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Rojas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 02:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flipthemedia.com/?p=3342#comment-3583</guid>
		<description>Thanks, lots of really good analysis here. 

You&#039;re right, we&#039;re not trying to compete with Engadget or Gizmodo, we thought there was a big opportunity to do something complementary to what was already out there. 

Our big challenge, as you&#039;ve noted, is to make the site something that people use every day (or at least frequently). We think we&#039;re part of the way there, but we&#039;re going to be introducing new features later this year that will address that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, lots of really good analysis here. </p>
<p>You&#8217;re right, we&#8217;re not trying to compete with Engadget or Gizmodo, we thought there was a big opportunity to do something complementary to what was already out there. </p>
<p>Our big challenge, as you&#8217;ve noted, is to make the site something that people use every day (or at least frequently). We think we&#8217;re part of the way there, but we&#8217;re going to be introducing new features later this year that will address that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
