<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Review of Robert Darnton’s &#8220;The Case For Books: Past, Present, and Future&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://flipthemedia.com/index.php/2010/02/the-case-for-books/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://flipthemedia.com/index.php/2010/02/the-case-for-books/</link>
	<description>A blog about the digital media revolution</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 19:53:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Belt</title>
		<link>http://flipthemedia.com/index.php/2010/02/the-case-for-books/comment-page-1/#comment-4799</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Belt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 05:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flipthemedia.com/?p=4438#comment-4799</guid>
		<description>This is a great review. More than anything, I just glad someone&#039;s out there championing books. I&#039;ve been a writer since I was a child and have enjoyed reading books for as long as I can remember (well, maybe not in some of my undergrad courses). To me, there&#039;s something special about holding a book in your hand and flipping through the pages. I enjoy getting closer to the end and blazing toward the finish line as fast I can. Lord of the Rings. The Bourne Identity. Harry Potter. These are stories and characters I lived with and loved, and it had everything to do with the  physical book I held in my hands.

I am in this program, however, so you know I&#039;m all for the digital revolution that&#039;s taking place. I understand the role Kindle and other e-readers will play in our world moving forward, and I&#039;m looking forward to seeing what they can do. I just hope we don&#039;t lose sight of the books we know and love. The libraries we need. The bookstores we frequent. This is a part of our culture, and it would be a real shame if we lost it for good. It&#039;s along the same lines of the problems facing the newspaper industry. There&#039;s something special about reading the newspaper, too. But that hasn&#039;t stopped users from flocking to the Web for free content. The difference here is that e-books won&#039;t be free. They might be cheaper than hardback books, but I think even the publishers will begin to drop prices if e-books become a real threat. They&#039;re going to have to.

Bottom line - change is coming. But what kind of change is still up for debate. It&#039;s going to alter the game forever, but my hope is that it doesn&#039;t completely eradicate the books I love. Will there be room for both mediums in the future? My fingers are crossed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great review. More than anything, I just glad someone&#8217;s out there championing books. I&#8217;ve been a writer since I was a child and have enjoyed reading books for as long as I can remember (well, maybe not in some of my undergrad courses). To me, there&#8217;s something special about holding a book in your hand and flipping through the pages. I enjoy getting closer to the end and blazing toward the finish line as fast I can. Lord of the Rings. The Bourne Identity. Harry Potter. These are stories and characters I lived with and loved, and it had everything to do with the  physical book I held in my hands.</p>
<p>I am in this program, however, so you know I&#8217;m all for the digital revolution that&#8217;s taking place. I understand the role Kindle and other e-readers will play in our world moving forward, and I&#8217;m looking forward to seeing what they can do. I just hope we don&#8217;t lose sight of the books we know and love. The libraries we need. The bookstores we frequent. This is a part of our culture, and it would be a real shame if we lost it for good. It&#8217;s along the same lines of the problems facing the newspaper industry. There&#8217;s something special about reading the newspaper, too. But that hasn&#8217;t stopped users from flocking to the Web for free content. The difference here is that e-books won&#8217;t be free. They might be cheaper than hardback books, but I think even the publishers will begin to drop prices if e-books become a real threat. They&#8217;re going to have to.</p>
<p>Bottom line &#8211; change is coming. But what kind of change is still up for debate. It&#8217;s going to alter the game forever, but my hope is that it doesn&#8217;t completely eradicate the books I love. Will there be room for both mediums in the future? My fingers are crossed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cheryl</title>
		<link>http://flipthemedia.com/index.php/2010/02/the-case-for-books/comment-page-1/#comment-4747</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheryl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 05:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flipthemedia.com/?p=4438#comment-4747</guid>
		<description>Wanted to add a comment regarding the example of microfilm-- microfilm is a wonderful case study of the future potential ramifications of efforts to convert book content to any particular format of the hour. The shelf life of formats is short - all of us have content we&#039;ve produced ourselves that is marooned on discs or tapes that we can no longer easily retrieve because the technology is deceased. At the time, whatever that format was seemed universal, but it faded from common use within a brief window of time.  I remember when microfilm was a waning standard in libraries, and unlike book or magazine content, you had to go to a restricted part of the library, learn how to use the readers, and search in inscrutable drawers of film, without the easy visual markers of text.  More often than not, kids doing research projects just skipped the hassle, and went straight to the stacks. The libraries may have saved some square footage on content storage, but the content was not easier to use-- it was harder.  Today&#039;s digital formats churn constantly, in a frantic cycle of business competition and trends.  It makes me nervous to think we&#039;re on the cusp of dumping all of our collective information into one or more of them without looking back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wanted to add a comment regarding the example of microfilm&#8211; microfilm is a wonderful case study of the future potential ramifications of efforts to convert book content to any particular format of the hour. The shelf life of formats is short &#8211; all of us have content we&#8217;ve produced ourselves that is marooned on discs or tapes that we can no longer easily retrieve because the technology is deceased. At the time, whatever that format was seemed universal, but it faded from common use within a brief window of time.  I remember when microfilm was a waning standard in libraries, and unlike book or magazine content, you had to go to a restricted part of the library, learn how to use the readers, and search in inscrutable drawers of film, without the easy visual markers of text.  More often than not, kids doing research projects just skipped the hassle, and went straight to the stacks. The libraries may have saved some square footage on content storage, but the content was not easier to use&#8211; it was harder.  Today&#8217;s digital formats churn constantly, in a frantic cycle of business competition and trends.  It makes me nervous to think we&#8217;re on the cusp of dumping all of our collective information into one or more of them without looking back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeffhora</title>
		<link>http://flipthemedia.com/index.php/2010/02/the-case-for-books/comment-page-1/#comment-4721</link>
		<dc:creator>jeffhora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 00:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flipthemedia.com/?p=4438#comment-4721</guid>
		<description>Nice review, Laila.

Many who know me know that I am a vocal advocate of the Amazon Kindle and electronic content.  However, I did actually read books before the Kindle came along!  I still have a VERY LARGE number of volumes, purchased over the years, about half of which I still haven’t read, but intend to.  I agree that e-reader content is best seen and understood as extending the existing businesses, to the degree that they continue to publish physical media.  It is easier and cheaper to get content distributed electronically, but precious few own e-readers or even are willing to read anything longer than an article on their computer screens, compared to the size of the literate public who have access in some way to a book.

The serendipitous activity of wandering through the stacks at a large library or used bookstore and stumbling across an item of interest is difficult to replicate online.  There are recommendation engines, referrals from friends, colleagues and sites, and the bibliographies at the end of other books and articles, but figuratively stumbling onto something previously unconsidered is something that seems can best be done in the physical world.  This is why I don’t fear for the fate of books.  That act of potential inspiration is unrepeatable virtually.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice review, Laila.</p>
<p>Many who know me know that I am a vocal advocate of the Amazon Kindle and electronic content.  However, I did actually read books before the Kindle came along!  I still have a VERY LARGE number of volumes, purchased over the years, about half of which I still haven’t read, but intend to.  I agree that e-reader content is best seen and understood as extending the existing businesses, to the degree that they continue to publish physical media.  It is easier and cheaper to get content distributed electronically, but precious few own e-readers or even are willing to read anything longer than an article on their computer screens, compared to the size of the literate public who have access in some way to a book.</p>
<p>The serendipitous activity of wandering through the stacks at a large library or used bookstore and stumbling across an item of interest is difficult to replicate online.  There are recommendation engines, referrals from friends, colleagues and sites, and the bibliographies at the end of other books and articles, but figuratively stumbling onto something previously unconsidered is something that seems can best be done in the physical world.  This is why I don’t fear for the fate of books.  That act of potential inspiration is unrepeatable virtually.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lailakaz</title>
		<link>http://flipthemedia.com/index.php/2010/02/the-case-for-books/comment-page-1/#comment-4636</link>
		<dc:creator>lailakaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 03:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flipthemedia.com/?p=4438#comment-4636</guid>
		<description>Cheryl, thank you for the note. Yes, great book. He gives you a lot to think about when considering the future of physical books.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cheryl, thank you for the note. Yes, great book. He gives you a lot to think about when considering the future of physical books.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cheryl Lowry</title>
		<link>http://flipthemedia.com/index.php/2010/02/the-case-for-books/comment-page-1/#comment-4628</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheryl Lowry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 23:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flipthemedia.com/?p=4438#comment-4628</guid>
		<description>Laila,

Thanks for this article, I am very interested in this topic-- I&#039;d like to explore it in the MCDM and will be sure to include this book in my research.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Laila,</p>
<p>Thanks for this article, I am very interested in this topic&#8211; I&#8217;d like to explore it in the MCDM and will be sure to include this book in my research.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lailakaz</title>
		<link>http://flipthemedia.com/index.php/2010/02/the-case-for-books/comment-page-1/#comment-4626</link>
		<dc:creator>lailakaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flipthemedia.com/?p=4438#comment-4626</guid>
		<description>Some other E-book projects:

Hathi Trust, A shared digital repository, http://www.hathitrust.org - this one seems to be a huge project, a cooperation between university libraries and they are digitizing both public domain as well as copyrighted books. I had never heard of them before doing the research for this review.


Some public domain books:

Project Gutenberg, http://www.gutenberg.org
The Online Books Page, http://digital.library.upenn.edu/books/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some other E-book projects:</p>
<p>Hathi Trust, A shared digital repository, <a href="http://www.hathitrust.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.hathitrust.org</a> &#8211; this one seems to be a huge project, a cooperation between university libraries and they are digitizing both public domain as well as copyrighted books. I had never heard of them before doing the research for this review.</p>
<p>Some public domain books:</p>
<p>Project Gutenberg, <a href="http://www.gutenberg.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.gutenberg.org</a><br />
The Online Books Page, <a href="http://digital.library.upenn.edu/books/" rel="nofollow">http://digital.library.upenn.edu/books/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
