Alec Baldwin Broke Cardinal Rules of Gun Safety Prosecutor Says

Alec Baldwin Broke Cardinal Rules of Gun Safety Prosecutor Says

SANTA FE, N.M. — A prosecutor told jurors Wednesday that Alec Baldwin violated the cardinal rules of gun safety while playing “make believe” on the set of “Rust,” resulting in the death of cinematographer Halyna Hutchins.

Erlinda Ocampo Johnson, one of two special prosecutors on the case, argued in her opening statement that Baldwin repeatedly violated film industry gun protocols in the days leading up to the fatal shooting. She also faulted him for failing to check his gun with armorer Hannah Gutierrez Reed, who had mistakenly loaded it with a live bullet.

“The defendant didn’t do a gun safety check with that inexperienced armorer,” Johnson said. “He pointed the gun at another human being, cocked the hammer and pulled the trigger in reckless disregard for Ms. Hutchins’ safety.”

In his opening statement, defense attorney Alex Spiro argued that it was not Baldwin’s responsibility to check the gun, and that he relied on others — Gutierrez Reed and first assistant director Dave Halls — to make sure the gun was safe.

“The actor’s job is to act,” he said. “He’s Harland Rust. He’s an outlaw running for his life who, in the incident in question, he’s pulling a six-shooter to try to defend himself. That’s why the gun has to be safe before it gets into the actor’s hands. His mind is somewhere else: in the being of another, a century away, an outlaw.”

Baldwin’s trial got underway Wednesday, nearly three years after Hutchins was accidentally killed in a church building at the Bonanza Creek Ranch in October 2021.

Baldwin sat at the defense table, with dark-framed glasses and close-cropped hair. When Spiro showed outtakes from the scene in the church, he leaned forward to watch his performance with his hand on his chin.

In their opening statements, both the prosecution and the defense talked about Baldwin’s Colt .45, which will be a major focus of the trial, and about the industrywide safety bulletins for gun use on set.

Johnson showed the jurors an image of the Italian-made replica, saying that Baldwin had asked for “the biggest gun available.” She said that the trial will show that the gun was working properly at the time of the shooting, dispelling the defense claim that Baldwin did not pull the trigger.

Spiro argued that the FBI had destroyed the gun during testing, depriving the defense of an opportunity to examine it for defects. But he also argued that even if Baldwin did pull the trigger, he would still not be guilty of involuntary manslaughter.

“On a movie set, you’re allowed to pull the trigger,” Spiro said.

The two sides disagreed on what rules actually apply on set. Johnson noted that Safety Bulletin #1 requires treating guns as if they are loaded, and forbids pointing a gun at anyone.

But Spiro pointed out that actors in Westerns routinely point guns at others while filming scenes.

“These cardinal rules, they’re not cardinal rules on a movie set… People point guns on movie sets,” Spiro said. “For acting to work, you have to be so close to the barrier of real and imagined that the viewer feels that it’s real.”

Spiro noted that Baldwin had been assured that the gun was “cold” — meaning it did not contain a charge. He said that no one in the church had any idea that it contained a live bullet.

“it’s impossible, literally impossible for a cold gun to hurt somebody,” he said. “It could hurt you more by dropping it on your foot.”

Spiro also argued that the investigators had failed to figure out the source of the live bullet. So at a certain point, he argued, they turned their attention to proving that Baldwin fired the gun.

“They weren’t really investigating anymore,” Spiro said. “They were trying to disprove Alec, to get Alec, to have this day.”

Baldwin’s wife Hilaria and brother Stephen sat behind him in the gallery. Gloria Allred, the attorney who represents Hutchins’ parents and sister, sat in the front row on the opposite side. She carried a framed photo of Hutchins with her mother, Olga Solovey, and her son Andros.

One of the key witnesses at the trial will be Joel Souza, the film’s director, who was wounded in the shoulder. In her opening statement, Johnson said that Souza would testify that Baldwin often went off-script.

“You will hear the director tell you, many times the defendant did his own thing,” Johnson said.

She argued that in the fatal incident, Baldwin was supposed to draw his gun from the holster, but was not supposed to fire. She said that witnesses saw him repeatedly put his finger on the trigger, in violation of the rules, and that he would sometimes cock the gun for no reason.

“The evidence will show that like in many workplaces, there are people who act in a reckless manner and place other individuals in danger and act without due regard for the safety of others,” she said. “That, you will hear, was the defendant, Alexander Baldwin.”

After opening statements, the prosecution called Deputy Nicholas Lefleur, one of the first officers on scene. The state played his lapel camera video, which showed medics frantically trying to save Hutchins’ life after she was shot. Lefleur testified at the involuntary manslaughter trial of Gutierrez Reed in February, and his lapel video was also played for the jury in that case.

Opening statements began Wednesday in the involuntary manslaughter trial of actor Alec Baldwin, nearly three years after cinematographer Halyna Hutchins was fatally shot on the New Mexico set of the Western film “Rust.”

Prosecutor Erlinda Johnson focused on Baldwin’s reckless behavior on set, saying he violated the “cardinal rules of firearm safety” by pointing a gun at a person and pulling the trigger. She also said the evidence would show the firearm was in “perfect order” and did not malfunction.

“When someone plays make-believe with a real gun in a real-life workplace, and while playing make-believe with that gun violates the cardinal rules of firearm safety, people’s lives are endangered and someone could be killed,” she told jurors. “The evidence will show that someone who played make-believe with a real gun and violated the cardinal rules of firearm safety is the defendant, Alexander Baldwin.”

In contrast, the defense blamed the film’s armorer and the first assistant director – jointly in charge of firearm safety on set – for allowing a real bullet to be loaded into the prop gun and failing to make it safe before it reached Baldwin.

“This was an unspeakable tragedy, but Alec Baldwin committed no crime. He was an actor, acting, playing the role of Harlan Rust. An actor playing a character can do things that are lethal,” attorney Alex Spiro said. “These ‘cardinal rules’ are not cardinal rules on a movie set.”

After opening statements, four law enforcement officers who responded to the “Rust” set or handled evidence testified about their roles in the investigation.

Baldwin has pleaded not guilty to a felony charge of involuntary manslaughter in connection with the death of 42-year-old Hutchins. If convicted, he could face up to 18 months in prison.

The trial stems from the fatal shooting on October 21, 2021, inside a makeshift church at the Bonanza Creek ranch as the cast and crew rehearsed a scene for the film “Rust.” Baldwin was practicing a “cross draw” – pulling a gun from a holster on the opposite side of his body from his draw hand – with a prop gun when it fired a live round, killing Hutchins and injuring director Joel Souza.

The shocking death was the first of its kind since the 1993 death of actor Brandon Lee, the son of martial arts icon Bruce Lee, who was killed in the filming of “The Crow” when his co-star fired a prop gun containing a fragment of a bullet.

Twelve jurors and four alternates were empaneled Tuesday for the Baldwin’s trial in Sante Fe. The trial is expected to last for about two weeks.

This is the third criminal case related to the on-set shooting. In March, Hannah Gutierrez Reed, the armorer for “Rust,” was found guilty of involuntary manslaughter and sentenced to 18 months in prison. Dave Halls, the assistant director, agreed to plead no contest to negligent use of a deadly weapon, the district attorney for New Mexico’s First Judicial District said. The terms of that deal included six months of probation and a suspended sentence, prosecutors said.

On set that fatal day, Gutierrez Reed loaded a prop six-shot revolver with what she’s said she believed were “dummy” rounds, a term for ammo that contains no explosive elements but appear to be real, according to investigators and her defense attorney. After a lunch break, Halls fetched the prop gun from a cart outside the church and yelled “cold gun,” indicating it was safe. He then handed the gun to Baldwin.

Baldwin then practiced the “cross draw” move and pointed the gun toward the camera, helmed by Hutchins, Souza and a camera operator. Suddenly, they heard a loud bang.

Hutchins, who was shot in her torso, was transported by helicopter to the hospital and later pronounced dead. Souza, who was hit in the shoulder, was treated at the hospital, and a projectile from a live round was removed from his back.

In opening statements, prosecutors said Baldwin did not follow appropriate safety rules on set, even before the fatal shooting.

When he fired a gun, he did not do a safety check, Johnson alleged. He also used the gun to point at things, cocked the hammer when he was not supposed to and put his finger on the trigger when he was not supposed to, according to Johnson. Forensic testing of the firearm showed that the gun did not malfunction, she alleged.

“After the shooting, Baldwin began to claim he did not pull the trigger,” she said. “The evidence will show, ladies and gentlemen, that’s not possible.”

“He pointed the gun at another human being, cocked the hammer and pulled that trigger, in reckless disregard for Ms. Hutchins’ safety,” she said.

Baldwin has previously stated to CNN that he did not pull the trigger during the fatal shooting, though he said he did cock the hammer of the gun.

“I never took a gun and pointed at somebody and clicked the thing,” Baldwin said in the 2022 interview.

In the defense’s opening statements, Spiro said the prosecution’s attempt to prove Baldwin pulled the trigger did not make him guilty of homicide. The key to the fatal shooting was that others had loaded the prop gun with a live bullet and had cleared it as safe before the gun reached Baldwin.

The prop gun was later damaged during unnecessary testing from the prosecution and investigators, hindering the evidence in the case, Spiro said.

Further, Spiro played a video from the scene in question, in which Baldwin pulls a gun with the camera up close. In the video, he is in continual discussion with people off-camera about how to position himself and how to “whip out” the gun.

“There’s no danger. They wanted him to do it again,” Spiro said.

After opening statements, four law enforcement investigators testified about their interactions with those on set and the chain of custody of the prop gun and rounds.

The first witness was Nicholas Lefleur, a former deputy with the Santa Fe Sheriff’s Office, who responded to the “Rust” set after the shooting and spoke briefly with Baldwin.

“I was holding the gun, yeah,” Baldwin said when Lefleur approached him, according to body-camera video played in court.

The deputy pulled Baldwin aside and told him not to speak to other people because they could all be witnesses, according to the video. However, the video shows Baldwin and other crew members continuing to discuss what happened in the shooting.

On cross-examination, Lefleur acknowledged he did not repeat his order or tell Baldwin to get away from other people.

Timoteo Benavidez, a former lieutenant with the Santa Fe County Sheriff’s Office, testified about his visit to the set shortly after the shooting.

He obtained the prop gun used in the shooting from Gutierrez Reed and then put it into his vehicle and locked the door, he testified. The gun did not have any rounds in it when he examined it, he said.

Santa Fe County sheriff’s Deputy Joseph Lujan testified he went to the hospital after the shooting and retrieved a projectile that doctors removed from Souza’s shoulder.

Finally, Marissa Poppell, a crime scene technician with the sheriff’s office, testified she sent the prop gun to the FBI for a firearm functioning test to make sure it was in “proper working order.” When the firearm came back from the FBI, the cylinder had been removed and a small internal component was in a separate plastic bag, she testified.

Five live rounds and one spent casing were found on set, she said.

The case has been marked by years-long fits and starts with turnovers in prosecutors, a prosecution stalled by questions surrounding the integrity of evidence and a steady spate of motions from Baldwin’s team attempting to get the charge thrown out.

In the run-up to Baldwin’s trial, the judge denied multiple defense motions seeking to throw out the case.

Baldwin’s attorneys had accused prosecutors of misconduct during the grand jury process; had argued the shooting death of Hutchins was an accident and Baldwin was not criminally liable; and had claimed the gun used in the shooting was destroyed during forensic testing by the FBI and the defense could not attempt to recreate the examination.

Baldwin’s prosecution was initially led by New Mexico First Judicial District Attorney Mary Carmack-Altwies, a Democrat who later stepped aside, leaving the work to special prosecutors.

One special prosecutor, Andrea Reeb, who also serves as a Republican state legislator, subsequently resigned from the case after Baldwin’s legal team moved to have her disqualified, citing constitutional questions about a lawmaker working for the prosecution.

Controversy surrounding Reeb later escalated after the New York Times obtained communications between Reeb and Carmack-Altwies following her hiring, in which the GOP lawmaker joked that serving on the team prosecuting Baldwin could help her political campaign. Reeb did not respond to a request for comment by the Times.

In April 2023, special prosecutors dismissed an involuntary manslaughter charge against Baldwin, citing “new facts” in the case. But in October, prosecutors said “additional facts have come to light,” and Baldwin was indicted by a grand jury in January on two counts of involuntary manslaughter.

Prosecutors initially sought to argue in court that Baldwin’s role as a producer also opened him up to potential liability for the alleged culture of unsafe practices on the set. However, in a significant victory for the defense, Judge Mary Marlowe Sommer ruled on Monday that Baldwin’s producer role will not be considered at trial.

Source: CNN, Variety

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top