The conservative wing of the new General Council of the Judiciary (CGPJ) has nominated four candidates to lead the judicial governing body, including the progressive-minded judge Pablo Lucas. Meanwhile, the progressive members have put forward three candidates, among them Ángeles Huet, who is considered to lean towards the conservative side.
Sources within the legal community told Europa Press that the members appointed by the Popular Party (PP) aimed to propose strong candidates like Pablo Lucas, Carmen Lamela, Antonio del Moral, and Esperanza Córdoba, who can unify perspectives within the judicial system.
They emphasized the qualifications of candidates such as Antonio del Moral and Carmen Lamela. Lamela, who has served on various courts, including the National Court, is described as dedicated and well-liked within the judiciary.
Regarding the second female candidate from the conservative bloc, Esperanza Córdoba, these sources noted that she has always been linked to the judiciary, possesses an in-depth knowledge of the CGPJ, does not belong to any judges’ association, and excels at forging large agreements and consensus. “She is well-liked by everyone,” they added.
On the other hand, Pablo Lucas, although presented by conservatives, is recognized for his conciliatory approach and center-left ideas. He has been a candidate for the Constitutional Court and is respected as an entirely independent magistrate who does not adhere to block politics.
Ultimately, these sources contend that any of the four conservative candidates could gain acceptance from the progressive bloc, which aligns with the argument that conservatives are expected to present in the upcoming plenary session on July 30, where a president needs to be elected by a three-fifths majority.
Conversely, the candidates proposed by members nominated by the Socialist Party (PSOE) face skepticism. While Ángeles Huet, despite leaning conservative, has held various judicial roles and previously served on the CGPJ, she hasn’t completely convinced everyone.
Additionally, the candidates Pilar Teso and Ana Ferrer, both with extensive judicial careers, present a challenge. They have already been previously nominated by the government, which might hinder their chances since the new president is supposed to be chosen directly by the council members and not the executive branch. “It’s very complicated for them to succeed,” the sources remarked.
As for the prospect of a woman leading both the CGPJ and the Supreme Court, the conservative bloc seems set to prioritize excellence and candidates capable of achieving consensus within the judiciary leadership.
Interestingly, there was an opportunity during the renewal of the Constitutional Court for the progressive judge María Luisa Balaguer to be named president. Ultimately, Cándido Conde-Pumpido was selected instead. This recent development during Pedro Sánchez’s government may influence the conservative wing’s arguments in favor of candidates who are not female judges.
Image and News Source: https://www.infobae.com/espana/agencias/2024/07/26/los-vocales-conservadores-y-progresistas-del-cgpj-incluyen-en-sus-listas-candidatos-a-presidente-de-la-otra-sensibilidad/
